Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
The fact that it was a majority opinion would seem to indicate that it wasn't a clear-cut case. More judges disagreed with Apple than agreed with them, but the fact that there was a dissenting minority would suggest that, in the eyes of that minority, their case had merit.
|
Whatever. It's over. And that "minority" (if I remember correctly) didn't deny that Apple colluded with the publishers, he just bought into their argument that the end justifies the means -- that Amazon had to be knocked down a few pegs because they had too much of the market.