View Single Post
Old 03-06-2016, 03:45 PM   #132
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by murg View Post
In this case, Apple could crack the phone, and hand the data over, without giving the government the uncracked phone. In this case, chain of custody is not that important, the actual data is.
Agreed. I don't think the government cares a bit about the phone itself. They just want the data inside. The problem is that Apple likely would never even agree to that.
Quote:
Or are you saying that it is more important for the government to be able to prosecute a few people rather than save millions of lives?
Not sure where you are getting this idea from. The government would likely argue here their efforts are to potentially save lots of lives which is more important than protecting the privacy of a few individuals (the two San Bernardino shooters).

Last edited by PatNY; 03-06-2016 at 03:48 PM.
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote