View Single Post
Old 03-01-2016, 07:30 PM   #361
BetterRed
null operator (he/him)
BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BetterRed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 21,779
Karma: 30237628
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
I will read up on exclusion dictionaries and see if I can use them. I assume I can make it work for the Word spelling engine, but I am not sure if I can for the Hunspell engine.
I have no expectations you would to apply them to hunspell dictionaries - that would definitely be a bridge too far. I just wanted to clarify how I 'adjust' the standard Word dictionaries.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
I have made a work-around for using the Hunspell custom dictionaries with the Word engine in my own procedure. However, using these for the standard Word spelling procedure is different. I have made an option in the setting screen to add these to the Custom Dictionaries for Word, but then a restart of Word is required.
As already indicated, I'll have no problems with having to restart Word when I want to switch from using Word's dictionaries to hunspell dictionaries and vice versa - but I would like to know which ones I'm currently using

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
Of course when an additional custom dictionary is used, it is displayed which one. You can even switch during operation.
By custom dictionaries I assume you mean the supplementary word lists that Word and hunspell can use and maintain. Are you saying they can be the same files - that would be cool? I use multiple 'custom dictionaries' in Word - one for general purpose, and others that are genre/domain specific.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
With regards to the settings you mention (talking about giving a finger...). Numbers are ignored by default, also with the Hunspell engine. However, words partially number, partially letters are not ignored and with reason. Often these are the result of OCR errors, one example which occurs often in Dutch is '2o' instead of 'zo'. Therefore I am doubting to make that an option. The same goes for Words in capitals, often these are smallcaps not identified correctly by the OCR process. The internet addresses might be possible, I will look into this. I might incorporate these options, but I am not sure yet.
Numbers are my main concern, I only mentioned the UPPERCASE and urls for 'completeness' sake.

I raise it because the spell checker in Sigil does ignore some words with numbers, but the spell checker in calibre doesn't ignore any - but both purport to use hunspell. If you're interested spellcheck this -- untitled.epub -- in sigil and calibre

The following is the same real book - sigil on the left, calibre on the right, with same dictionaries.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Capture.JPG
Views:	319
Size:	221.1 KB
ID:	146819

In the following index entry, Calibre reports 235n32 as a misspelling, but Sigil doesn't - and it is not because of semantic settings.

Code:
<a class="normal" href="../Text/Notes-1.html#page_235">235n32</a>
But for real books such as the one above I only convert them to DOCX for the purpose of iFilter based content searching. I would never spell check it in Word.

BR

Last edited by BetterRed; 03-01-2016 at 07:37 PM.
BetterRed is online now   Reply With Quote