View Single Post
Old 02-26-2016, 10:40 AM   #27304
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeshadow View Post
Oh yes an old nerd thread (someplace I could enjoy being a youngster )
I am officially an Old Phart these days, though I'd like to think I maintain a youthful outlook.

Quote:
Dennis, nicely summed up dos history for those who came after us, although I admit I had no idea about unices back then and that there was a unixoid DOS shell replacement is completely new to me.
There were actually several, including DOS implementations of the Bourne and C shells. I collected an assortment. The MKS Toolkit simply offered the most complete and polished solution for the PC. Aside from the Korn shell, there was a full version of the vi editor and a few other things. I was able to use the DOS PRINT command with some Korn shell aliases to craft a decent approximation of the Unix lp print spooler.

(MKS no longer exists as such, but the Toolkit became the basis for Interix, which underlay Microsoft Services for Unix package.)

Quote:
I was 12 when I came to computing (386-SX 16; 1 MB RAM; 40 MB HDD; VGA and a 24 dot matrix printer)
I was over twice that.

Quote:
I began with DR-DOS 5.0 (OS/2 thereafter), so my first shock was after I had to switch to MS-DOS 5 was to discover there was no xdel (or similar) command... MS' deltree came with 6.
The first computer I dealt with was an IBM mainframe compatible at a bank I've mentioned elsewhere. It was the days when the original IBM-PC running DOS 2.1 was appearing on corporate desktops as an engine to run the Lotus 1,2,3 spreadsheet. I watched bank officers write memos as Lotus text fields because they knew how to use it but didn't know how to use a word processor or have one installed on their machine.

IIRC, DR-DOS originated from requests by DR customers for a version of DOS that could be embedded in ROM. MSDOS couldn't back then - to be ROMmable, the code and data segments needed to be separate, and weren't in MSDOS. When it got to a reasonable state of development, DR decided to release it as a commercial product and alternative to MSDOS, and it gained a reasonable following.
______
Dennis
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote