View Single Post
Old 02-21-2016, 03:17 AM   #51
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
BTW, does anyone know: Can a MitM attack be successfully executed, in the real world, if you check that the server shows a properly issued SSL cert? That is, assuming your browser is not compromised, if you actually check that the cert is issued to the correct domain from a trusted root, is there a legitimate chance of there being a MitM? I'm seriously asking because I'm not that versed in the implementation details of SSL or proxies.
Disclaimer: I am going to join you all in not being a security expert.

But as I understand, this is the exact threat which HTTP Strict Transport Security protects against.

MITM is usually leveraged to strip the SSL and relies on the user not knowing that the website should use HTTPS.
Of course, there are some attacks that strike against TLS itself. But generally those get fixed by software updates (not much else you can do really).


As you say, this all depends on your computer (and the certificate authority!) not being compromised. If that happens, you've lost before you started fighting.

Last edited by eschwartz; 02-21-2016 at 03:24 AM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote