View Single Post
Old 02-16-2016, 07:06 AM   #51
beachwanderer
-
beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.beachwanderer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
beachwanderer's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,602
Karma: 16748808
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: At the Baltic Sea
Device: Some
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleshuffle View Post
... ambiguous as it gets. It only says that there might be copyright protection if the changes are big enough to give the new version "individuality."
Which brings us back to the test of the individual case. As in: Typography and layout won't matter too much in a novel but would in modern lyrics (and you don't have to cite Morgensterns Fisches Nachtgesang so see this).

Dr. Kreutzer did a nice piece some years back, called "Digitalisierung gemeinfreier Werke durch Bibliotheken"(german,3rd link from bottom) which offers some general insight but was/is not undisputed in all aspects.

Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleshuffle View Post
Do you have any examples where a reworking of orthography was granted copyright protection in a court of law?
Yes, that would be helpful.

Last edited by beachwanderer; 02-16-2016 at 07:09 AM.
beachwanderer is offline   Reply With Quote