View Single Post
Old 02-16-2016, 06:40 AM   #48
doubleshuffle
Unicycle Daredevil
doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.doubleshuffle ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
doubleshuffle's Avatar
 
Posts: 13,944
Karma: 185432100
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet of the Pudding Brains
Device: Aura HD (R.I.P. After six years the USB socket died.) tolino shine 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubeus View Post
https://www.ige.ch/urheberrecht/haeu...ic-domain.html

Ok thats swiss, and it is not in general. But this clearly points out, that it might be copyrighted even if you just do orthographic changes.

I know what i'm talking of. If you dont trust me: you dont have to. I dont care.
Thanks. I wasn't doubting you, just interested. Would orthographic changes be so-called "kleine Münze"?


EDIT: I've checked the link, and the only section pertaining to changed orthography is - to my non-lawyer ears - as ambiguous as it gets. It only says that there might be copyright protection if the changes are big enough to give the new version "individuality." Do you have any examples where a reworking of orthography was granted copyright protection in a court of law?

Last edited by doubleshuffle; 02-16-2016 at 06:49 AM.
doubleshuffle is offline   Reply With Quote