Quote:
Originally Posted by jue
No, I didn't get anything before and didn't edit anything I attached. I was wondering myself why the output started with 5620.
The /lib/libc.so.6 output looks fine (directed stdout and stderr to file, nothing removed):
Code:
GNU C Library (EGLIBC) stable release version 2.19, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.8.3 20140401 (prerelease).
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.35 system on 2014-09-03.
Available extensions:
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libc ABIs: UNIQUE
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.eglibc.org/issues/>.
but the libc thing might have been a bad lead. See my updated previous post. |
5620 was the process id.
The libc is 2.19, which **should** have all symbols required since the highest the program needs is 2.17.
**but**
The Kindle is running the specialized Ubuntu fork of glibc, eglibc.
(The two projects have since been merged together.)
So there is a possiblity of a mis-match, depending what baf built against.
You could do a 'readelf -a ...' on the files he built, but that would, at most, only tell us exactly what is wrong.
The conclusion is the same - the attempt at a static build has errors in it.
fail this build and let baf re-build it.