View Single Post
Old 02-09-2016, 12:41 PM   #185
Shane R
Fanatic
Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 518
Karma: 4274548
Join Date: Nov 2013
Device: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Which is better? To spend more time recycling, or making the gadget more durable, so it has to be recycled less often?
That would end up being a circular argument.

Apple sold tens of millions of iphones and iPads last quarter.

What if you impact the environment more, by using less materials to produce your products, which over time, leads to a far lighter carbon footprint through more efficient fuel use given that there is less total weight being shipped?
Shane R is offline   Reply With Quote