View Single Post
Old 02-09-2016, 08:33 AM   #22
Shane R
Fanatic
Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 518
Karma: 4274548
Join Date: Nov 2013
Device: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
This does seem like an unreasonable situation to me. If the o/s detects tampering with the fingerprint scanner, the sensible thing to do would be to fall back to making the user enter the PIN, just as you have to do when you first switch the phone on following a reboot, for example.
You can't render an individuals phone inoperable enough to require replacement. I understand the necessity of the security measures, but they have to stop short of destroying the phones ability to operate.

That's just tone-deaf.
Shane R is offline   Reply With Quote