Quote:
Originally Posted by Glukkkk
I repeat once again.
The question was asked by the end user to think about the purchase of an electronic device exclusively for reading books.
For the end user does not have significant differences in 2013 or 2015.
Yes. Specifications are not significant differences. But...
Higher resolution (220dpi -> 300dpi) and more memory (2GB -> 4GB) have no meaning when reading a book. Our unit is designed for reading books, is not it?
So.
One page of the book takes about 1,5kb.
The 1GB can store more than 0.5 million pages, or 1,500 books.
How much time you need to read this number of pages / books?
Why keep so many books available at any time on the Internet?
So why do we need + 2GB device for reading books? Not necessary. This is another game of marketing.
Much the same can be said of the resolution.
Most users do not see any difference between 220dpi and 300dpi. And never see if you do not buy a microscope.
Moreover, many do not like "cold" light a new screen with 300dpi.
Program shell in 2013/2015 completely identical. Up to each menu / submenu ...
...
Many letters... :-)
|
Some people will notice the resolution but others won't.
Now as to the book storage: some users collect certain types of books and would like to keep the entire collection on the device.
Extra storage is not a marketing ploy.
The OP did not specify the type of reader that he/she is.
So he/she may need lots of storage.
As per how long it takes to read, it depends on the book and the person reading it.
I think I understand what you are trying to say.
Correct me if I am wrong.
Are you trying to say that all books on all devices look exactly the same?
And that the OP should just grab any old reader?