I thought the H2O wonderful (better than my Aura HD which I never managed to restart after a complicated book killed it (and I tried everything on this forum save opening it). Then I bought the Glo HD, initially as a spare, but it quickly turned into my main reader. I recently tried it again, to read a book with many pictures (del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities), and I gave up immediately: to my eyes the Glo HD is so much better that it compensates the extra 7", though I prefer the extra real estate and much prefer the height/width ratio of the H2O: I read kepubs only with header/footer, and all my books go to the reader with 5pt top/bottom margins, which looks better with it. I wish Kobo would combine the Glo HD quality with the Aura HD size - I'm indifferent to the waterproof feature.
PS: a smaller weight would be good too - I have arthritic hands and it does make a difference.
Last edited by anacreon; 01-29-2016 at 03:21 AM.
|