Thread: Glo tapping on endnotes
View Single Post
Old 01-24-2016, 05:57 AM   #10
John F
Grand Sorcerer
John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,954
Karma: 70880793
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo Clara 2E
All IMO...

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor View Post
In a "real" book, I don't know. But, if I converted a random Wikipedia page, there would probably be one. The problem is that it is a valid thing to happen, so it has to be considered. ...
Considered yes; the normal use case, no.

How long have ereaders and touch screens been around, and they still can't come up with a better solution? It is time to stop considering and do something.

Until GeoffR mentioned the "too easily clickable endnote problem", I hadn't heard of anyone else complaining. I haven't even heard of anyone complaining about too easily clickable inline table of contents links, and those are HUGH.

Quote:
...
The real thing is that we are way beyond the point that a footnote link in an ebook, or any other electronic form, should look and behave like in a paper book. And the book authors/creators should be doing something different. And the software creators should be as well. ...
I would like the ereader software creators to do more. I don't want to have to strip DRM and run everything through some other piece of software just to get clickable footnote links (and I'm guessing the more typical reader isn't even aware they could/should/have to).
John F is offline   Reply With Quote