View Single Post
Old 01-20-2016, 08:12 PM   #1
roger64
Wizard
roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,624
Karma: 3120635
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: Kindle PW3 (wifi)
Tolerance and parsing mistakes

Hi

Sigil 9.2. Archlinux 64 bits.

I now switch often between the Calibre Editor and Sigil (the lattter for some more advanced features or plugins). I like better the Editor because of its smooth selecting. I have the feeling that Sigil is "reluctant" to select and does it by small hiccups.

As an editing tool, Sigil should maybe be a bit more tolerant to user's mistakes. A case in point: on a fairly complex EPUB, on the Editor, I modified two tags on two different chapters and closed them, mistakenly of course, with /subtitle instead of /p. That's life...

I switched to Sigil to do another task: it informed me that two chapters were ill-formed and that the EPUB could not be opened. God! If the Editor does the same, I shall be kicked out of my book. Happily, the Editor welcomed me back and informed me of these two parsing errors.

The point I wanted to make is that, as an editing tool, Sigil maybe should be more tolerant to parsing errors of this kind.

Last edited by roger64; 01-20-2016 at 08:20 PM.
roger64 is offline   Reply With Quote