Hi
Sigil 9.2. Archlinux 64 bits.
I now switch often between the Calibre Editor and Sigil (the lattter for some more advanced features or plugins). I like better the Editor because of its smooth selecting. I have the feeling that Sigil is "reluctant" to select and does it by small hiccups.
As an editing tool, Sigil should maybe be a bit more tolerant to user's mistakes. A case in point: on a fairly complex EPUB, on the Editor, I modified two tags on two different chapters and closed them, mistakenly of course, with
/subtitle instead of
/p. That's life...
I switched to Sigil to do another task: it informed me that two chapters were ill-formed and that the EPUB could not be opened. God! If the Editor does the same, I shall be kicked out of my book. Happily, the Editor welcomed me back and informed me of these two parsing errors.
The point I wanted to make is that, as an editing tool, Sigil maybe should be more tolerant to parsing errors of this kind.