View Single Post
Old 01-11-2016, 09:19 PM   #172
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,893
Karma: 6120478
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
The .html extension (vs .xhtml) is perfectly legal in epub 3. If epubcheck or any other validator complains with anything other than an info, the validator is wrong.


Edit:
I partially take that back... the IDPF does say "SHOULD" and not "MUST" (See their official definitions at the start on the epub 3 docs)

› The XHTML Content Document filename SHOULD use the file extension .xhtml.

So I guess a validator giving a warning or info about it is okay, but it should not error out.

KevinH

Last edited by KevinH; 01-11-2016 at 10:07 PM.
KevinH is offline   Reply With Quote