The .html extension (vs .xhtml) is perfectly legal in epub 3. If epubcheck or any other validator complains with anything other than an info, the validator is wrong.
Edit:
I partially take that back... the IDPF does say "SHOULD" and not "MUST" (See their official definitions at the start on the epub 3 docs)
› The XHTML Content Document filename SHOULD use the file extension .xhtml.
So I guess a validator giving a warning or info about it is okay, but it should not error out.
KevinH
Last edited by KevinH; 01-11-2016 at 10:07 PM.
|