Quote:
Originally Posted by knc1
Ah, you answered the wrong question -
Those links are about how the sources are GPLv2, which is not the question I asked.
I asked what section and sub-section of GPLv2 you are reading that the changes have to be 'contributed back'.
The changes have to be also subject to GPLv2 terms, but the GPLv2 license says nothing about 'contributed back'.
You have in mind a different license (some OpenSource licenses do have terms that include 'contribute back' but not the GPLv2).
|
English isn't my first language and I didn't explain it wrong. I'm sorry.
But I think that detail is superfluous, no need to continue about licensing debates. Anyway, you helped me to identify another mistake when writing English
