View Single Post
Old 01-04-2016, 06:03 AM   #153
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by timofonic View Post
It appears twice:

*I n the Sourceforge project description.
*The README.TXT file.

I reported it in his forum. It's moderated, so he or one of the moderators approved it manually. I also sent him an email and wrote it in his uservoice account related to coolreader.

I don't notify GPL violations because of nothing, I researched more than enough and asked skilled people about it. Now I'm waiting reply
Ah, you answered the wrong question -
Those links are about how the sources are GPLv2, which is not the question I asked.

I asked what section and sub-section of GPLv2 you are reading that the changes have to be 'contributed back'.

The changes have to be also subject to GPLv2 terms, but the GPLv2 license says nothing about 'contributed back'.
You have in mind a different license (some OpenSource licenses do have terms that include 'contribute back' but not the GPLv2).
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote