View Single Post
Old 01-03-2016, 08:12 AM   #37
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phssthpok View Post
Nah, spoken like someone who uses Subversion and can't be bothered moving to git...
I am fairly positive subversion has the concept of merging as well.

Now if you are so used to ancient VCS's that you protest it is impossible to maintain local commits, I would understand where you are coming from, but you are still wrong.

If you are so used to ancient VCS's with substandard tools for managing merge conflicts, duplicate merges, no rebase support, etc. that you think it would be too awkward and you'd rather maintain a series of *.patch'es, and don't plan on doing that either, then I don't have much sympathy, sorry.

Last edited by eschwartz; 01-03-2016 at 08:22 AM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote