View Single Post
Old 01-03-2016, 04:39 AM   #322
Tex2002ans
Wizard
Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Tex2002ans ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,306
Karma: 13057279
Join Date: Jul 2012
Device: Kobo Forma, Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeshadow View Post
Re quotes: in Polish, direct speech may be not only be enclosed by quot. marks, the use of dashes is legit too. So much for a single "hard coded" quot class.
Yeah, I remember I looked it up way back when doing some research on Wikipedia and pointed Toxaris to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotat..._all_languages

You pretty much have every single variation in the book: symbols, backwards symbols, upside down symbols, flipped, not flipped.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
Whaddya mean, "old" versions? I haven't looked into it specifically lately, but last I did, we still had to manually code numbered list entries if they started somewhere other than "1."
My brain is doing no goods. I forgot if that bug was Old/New ADE (and I haven't tested it in years either). All I know is that many of us decided to hardcode lists long ago because of that gods damn counting bug.

Was I thinking of the bug with the double digit numbers getting chopped off in <ol>? Or did that one not get fixed yet either?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
(Ha! I did get the joke. good!).
I like to make myself chuckle.
Tex2002ans is offline   Reply With Quote