View Single Post
Old 12-19-2015, 09:11 PM   #1
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Building the Linux standalone Sigil installer

There is no real reason to use makeinstaller if you are building yourself.

It's purpose is to create a fully redistributable "frozen" version which can be installed by anyone -- even if they don't have python3, Qt5, etc. -- and installs into /opt


And if you look at src/CMakeLists.txt, the linux_python_gather.py is created if you define PKG_SYSTEM_PYTHON, which of course is necessary if you will be making a standalone installer.
makeinstaller just runs that file, I think from looking at it it should be complete.
But I certainly haven't tried it...

...

Why are you using checkinstall instead of a proper package manager? I don't know much of anything at all about using debian's buildsystem, but I *think* they have some way of building the git version of a package.
All I know is it is much easier with ArchLinux -- hey, I maintain the sigil-git package.

Last edited by eschwartz; 12-19-2015 at 09:15 PM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote