Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks
They play nice 
Kovid made them do it  |
That's great news, I was rather concerned (I remember having problems with two instances of the GUI accessing the same library on a network drive in an early experiment years ago).
Quote:
The old saw... Just because you did it that way years ago...
Calibre did not have VL's years ago. You had no choices then.
And yes, I would expect a large, single would use less resources than multiple.
So you have another choice (or at least, a test case) to make 
|
I know it's concidered a cardinal sin in the Calibre community, but multiple libraries makes accessing the files directly outside of Calibre a lot easier too, so no plans to change.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz
The CLI server doesn't really use a lot of resources...
Let me check my servers (I have systemd user services running for them)...
Well. Currently running at a combined 0.5% CPU and 3% memory.
|
Cool ;^>
Quote:
|
And do note that the currently-underway server rewrite handles multiple libraries in one process, and I can only assume from the GUI as well.
|
I'm not bothered about running the server from CLI as lang as it plays nice with the GUI version.
Quote:
|
Keep an eye out for calibre v3.0, coming... sometime vaguely soon-ish. (a/k/a whenever it is ready.)
|
I know this is probably a 'how long is a piece of string?' question, but any idea on when that may be? I have nothing really urgent to serve, so waiting a week or two for the new version is fine, but if it's going to be a few months, I'll just get on with the multiple CLI versions in the meantime ;^>
~Mex