Quote:
Originally Posted by taosaur
EDIT: Okay, admittedly a bit trollish  But to pursue the question further and avoid "arguing taste," is it even reasonable to present Baen as an example of traditional publishing?
|
In what specific way would you consider them not to be a traditional publisher? They sign publishing contracts with authors, and publish hardbacks, paperbacks and ebooks.
Quote:
Isn't nontraditionality of selection, promotion and distribution a substantial part of their shtick?
|
Not that I'm aware of. They are a traditional publisher specialising in SF and fantasy, just as, say, TOR and Ace do. In what way would you regard Baen as different to TOR?
Quote:
Maybe they're playing some kind of gatekeeper role, more in terms of subject matter than quality, perhaps...
|
I'm afraid I disagree. Baen certainly act as a gatekeeper in quality terms. Amazon is full of appallingly bad SF. The reason I buy Baen's monthly bundle each month, sight unseen, is precisely because 20-odd years' experience has taught me that they publish books that I enjoy. I see nothing remotely funny about that even if you do.