Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
The sources of the data are clearly referenced and are reputable. Why comment on something that you've not taken the trouble to look at?
|
In which case:
Why is it reputable when the references that the data is taken from for many countries are only secondhand (or worse-hand) ones, including that for the USA; furthermore the specific secondhand reference used for USA data is not identified?
Why is the data for the USA reputable when it is different to the US own NHTSA's data?
Why is the data reputable when the data differs between the Wikipedia article linked to and other Wikipedia articles traversing related ground?