Quote:
Originally Posted by issybird
I find that bizarre, frankly. Do the lies, half-truths and vicious tirades (and I wouldn't stop at that, if I were delineating the book's faults) need to be exposed? I almost think that such a treatment gives them substance, if not some credence as well.
|
It's a historically important book, however unpleasant its content. An annotated academic version analysing the propaganda in the book certainly strikes me as something worthy of merit.