View Single Post
Old 12-02-2015, 01:29 PM   #195
Sarmat89
Fanatic
Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sarmat89 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 530
Karma: 2268308
Join Date: Nov 2015
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
I can see at a glance that to semantically tag EVERY BLOODY ELEMENT in a book the way this guy wants will take me far more time than our current process. No argument.
You already have to tag 'every bloody element in a book' to make it stand out from body text. You do the same operations to assign your personal made-up style, as the predefined semantic style. This argument is rather absurd.
Quote:
And while the OP can say that his idea is NOT DocBook--it IS DocBook.
Why should we use a DocBook when we make books, not computer documentation?
Sarmat89 is offline   Reply With Quote