View Single Post
Old 11-29-2015, 10:43 PM   #12
ProDigit
Karmaniac
ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ProDigit ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,553
Karma: 11499146
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Miami FL
Device: PRS-505, Jetbook, + Mini, +Color, Astak Ez Reader Pro, PPW1, Aura H2O
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB View Post
Just to raise a nit, with the same font, 8 point type will be the same size on either the 200dpi or the 300dpi screen (the em square would be ~8/72" on a side). I mentioned the same font since there are variances in how much of the em square is used so different fonts can be a different size at the same point setting. I'd suspect that you meant pixel since 8 points would be ~22 pixels on the 200 DPI screen and ~33 pixels on the 300 DPI screen.any length of time.
Yeah, I thought so.
Following that logic, it means that if 6pt would be the smallest readable font size on a 200dpi, then 4pt would be the smallest on a 300DPI screen; any smaller and the letters or symbols would be mutilated due to too low pixels.

8pt is barely readable on a 200DPI screen.
I haven't tried below 8pt, but is possible that 6pt can be read on 200DPI screens.
I don't think a lot of people will want to read a book written in 8pt or lower; unless they make use of a magnifying glass.
ProDigit is offline   Reply With Quote