Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
Thx, Doits. Not worried; just don't understand what on earth they were thinking, other than...well, just ONE "toc," I guess.
Excellent points, all round. (I honestly thought, initially, he was discussing DocBook, which for all intents and purposes, DOES do what he wants, as near as I can tell.) Great pointer on the meta-refines, too. In fact, I didn't know that much about using those, so I've saved it to read through.
Hitch
|
I think the committee was cutting relations with DAISY. But so far as the format goes I have no problems with the new TOC format. It is easier for a newcomer to learn than the old one was. Of course there is also the page number mapping issue to technical books.
Dale