MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

AnotherCat · 11-26-2015, 05:25 PM

Harry, I suggest that you read my post again.

I said "It seems there may be more to it than reading the headline infers...". I then added the quote from the police spokesman which conveys that the vehicle was moving.

At no stage did I make any claim that the vehicle was either stopped or not, I just presented the quote that indicates that the driver and the police have different views on whether it was or not. I had no need to quote the driver as her claim was already a given.

I think from any sensible reading of the news article it would appear, because of the conflicting statements of the driver and the police, that there is, in fact, more to it than reading the headline infers.

You now seem to be claiming that the driver's claim is the only one that matters and that there is no more to the case than that; I suspect because it, taken by itself, supports your case.

11-26-2015, 05:25 PM	#57
AnotherCat .... Posts: 1,547 Karma: 18068960 Join Date: May 2012 Device: ....	Harry, I suggest that you read my post again. I said "It seems there may be more to it than reading the headline infers...". I then added the quote from the police spokesman which conveys that the vehicle was moving. At no stage did I make any claim that the vehicle was either stopped or not, I just presented the quote that indicates that the driver and the police have different views on whether it was or not. I had no need to quote the driver as her claim was already a given. I think from any sensible reading of the news article it would appear, because of the conflicting statements of the driver and the police, that there is, in fact, more to it than reading the headline infers. You now seem to be claiming that the driver's claim is the only one that matters and that there is no more to the case than that; I suspect because it, taken by itself, supports your case. Last edited by AnotherCat; 11-26-2015 at 05:27 PM.