Thread: Underlining
View Single Post
Old 11-24-2015, 06:43 AM   #22
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,714
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Notjohn View Post
@Hitch: <i> and <b> work just fine. That they were ever deprecated seems insanity to me. I've had trouble with <u> and had to create a style for it. But I think that that was because the underlined words were also bolded, and Sigil at least doesn't like me to do that, but creates a style of its own on the fly.
I know of no styles being created automatically by Sigil in the latest versions (with the exception of the html toc css). Can you be more specific?

EDIT: and in previous versions, it was my experience that the auto-generation of inline styles (and the code-modification their generation was triggered by) was easily avoidable by choosing the Pretty-Print-only clean-source preference. Tidy was responsible for creating inline styles (if you allowed it to) and Tidy has been gone since v0.8.900.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 11-24-2015 at 07:40 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote