Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
because you can NAME an element in HTML, something like ARTICLE, that's somehow "better" than having "p.article" and p class="article" (respectively) in CSS and HTML.
|
It is obviously better, as it is more clear this way than generic divs/paragraphs with arbitrary classes assigned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz
Saying XHTML and HTML5 is obsolete already tells me that that this whole thread is just a lot of navel gazing.
|
Once again, (X)HTML was designed for computer manuals, not books. Take any book and tell me what elements have its semantic representation in HTML: Title page/Title -- none, Dedication -- none, Epigraph -- none, chapter titles -- none again, 'letters' -- none! Everything has to be imitated with the direct formatting!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle91
I mean, really, how often is strikethrough used in a book...
|
I can recall two books which used it for in-universe text correction.