View Single Post
Old 11-21-2015, 08:07 AM   #133
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
I'm no expert on US law, Federal or State, let alone US anti-trust laws. But given the source I would not lose any sleep at this stage. And in any event, at the moment Amazon has a single physical store which I think we can regard as somewhat of a test. Amazon no doubt has excellent lawyers and I cannot see them placing themselves in a position like, say, the price-fixing cartel of publishers. It may be that we have lawyers looking for lucrative new clients pitching to an industry devoid of ideas and desperate. The position now being a very public one, I'm sure it won't be long before we hear from a real expert or two. I would, however, observe that the purpose of anti-trust law is not to protect legacy players from competition.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote