Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
The issue in this specific case is that the claim is being made that Mr Frank had creative input in the original published edition, so there is no earlier edition to compare it to. Whether or not that claim is valid would be something that a court would have to decide.
|
But for many years they have claimed that Anne was the sole author, and that the published diary really was Anne's words.
And since the original manuscripts have been compared to published versions, it seems clear that that is what they are. I don't see that this claim has any merit whatsoever.