View Single Post
Old 11-15-2015, 12:25 PM   #30
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
Why would the publishers keep editable copies of all their books? They don't own the copyright. It's the author's property. If the author doesn't keep copies and backups of the final manuscript, that's the author's bad, not the publisher. Oh, I forgot, the point is to bash the publishers.
The publishers should keep editable copies for as long as they own the rights to the book.
So, not quite forever, but for practical purposes pretty close.

Oh, "they don't own the copyright", yeah right, technicalities either way it isn't exactly illogical for them to keep an editable digital copy of the books they are currently selling/have the right to sell.
It is not the author's bad, or not exclusively. The publisher is also (only?) the one losing money when they can't sell the book they have the right to sell.

Honestly, I am not sure I could come up with a worse argument if I tried for a very long time.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote