View Single Post
Old 11-15-2015, 07:36 AM   #3
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,342
Karma: 234636059
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One, PW4, PW5
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
This above was posted by a moderator in green:



Does the above rule apply to Amazon Prime Lending library?
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Also, this was was posted by another moderator:



The first post says "methods", while the second post says "... discuss, encourage, or otherwise condone ..."; so is there no discussion/mention of DRM and library books at all, or is it OK to discuss removing DRM from library books as long as you don't mention methods and do it in a non positive manner?

Thank you for the clarifications.
-John
This is grayer. For example, one can say, as posters have, that you can't/shouldn't remove DRM from library books. Not being able to say that gets into Alice in Wonderland territory. You'd want to be sure that it was very non-positive and not to bring it up for the sake of shooting it down, I.e., don't be disingenuous or tacitly condone it while overtly condemning it.

I'm sorry I can't be clearer and my answer illustrates that interpretations can vary, so keep that in mind. In short, this is a Justice Potter Stewart response.
issybird is offline