Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mapreri@DebBug804887
FYI I do use sigil, and I firstly packaged and now maintain it in Debian
only because I needed (ans still need) it.
I'm sorry that upstream sigil developers are so little tolerant towards
linux distributions  I fully understand their position, but still this
makes me sad. |
Bonus points for being ontopic when discussing what is clearly a packaging bug.
And my $0.02 as an innocent bystander is that Debian has NO right to complain about the attitude of upstream, considering how long it took them to finish complaining about
inscrutable licensing issues without ever having mentioned anything upstream.