Thread: Image size
View Single Post
Old 11-09-2015, 09:25 PM   #3
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 80,598
Karma: 150249619
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
It is not a small limit.

It is just about the maximum you can get without distorting the view of the website.
That depends on the size of the window used in the web browser. On my laptop, the size of the images can go larger before there is any distortion. On the desktop, I have a much higher resolution screen and the images can go much larger before any distortion.

Quote:
As for deleting vs. re-attaching, I can't be fussed with that. If the image is important, the poster will re-post it.
And then again, maybe not. But the issue is that the thread is now useless. Is it really the job of the moderator to make threads useless even if the user who posted the images made them too large?
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote