View Single Post
Old 11-09-2015, 02:44 PM   #22
willus
Fuzzball, the purple cat
willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.willus ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
willus's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,303
Karma: 11087488
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: California
Device: iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaleDe View Post
It would seem that Ghostscript is saving the image rather than copying the binary data into a file. Saving a lossless image will essentially create the same image but a lossy image will certainly change if you create it instead of copying the binary. There are programs that know how to copy the binary. Also copying a binary does not require a license for the format.
Agreed. I got fooled because ghostscript actually tries to maintain the source PDF's encoding method for each image, and because of that, I thought it was just replicating the original image's object data stream from the source file, but apparently it is not. As you said, if the image is lossless to begin with, then there is no impact to re-encoding.
willus is offline   Reply With Quote