View Single Post
Old 11-05-2015, 12:33 AM   #4
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinisajoy View Post
Ok, that article confused me as DMCA has nothing to do with DRM. It protects ALL copyrighted material from being plagiarized. DRM does not matter.

Heck I could personally send DMCA letters to a few bloggers or websites. They swiped a recipe from Food.com.
It does not have drm.
Do you mind double-checking what the DMCA is?

Last I checked, the DMCA was a set of laws that among other things, forbids circumvention of "technical protection methods", as well as instituting the Safe Harbor guidelines for online services and ISPs.

Under the Safe Harbor provision, one facet of the DMCA, takedown letters can be issued -- this should not be an automatic proof that the law does not serve any other purpose.

It has NEVER "protected copyrighted material from being plagiarized" -- we already have laws that do that, they're called "copyright".



I could be wrong, though... maybe they (gov't) have changed it while I wasn't looking...

Last edited by eschwartz; 11-05-2015 at 12:36 AM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote