View Single Post
Old 11-04-2015, 01:03 PM   #11
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
In the linux world:

Ubuntu does the same thing, but at least each release is in alphabetical order.
Debian doesn't change often enough to get confusing.
ArchLinux only has the one version, but they provide incremental updates ~dozen times a day. Running old snapshots is not an option, not that there is any fathomable reason to do so.

Windows:

Spoiler:

1.x
2.x
3.0
3.1
NT 3.1
3.2
NT 3.5x
95
NT 4
98
2000
ME
XP
Vista
7
8
10


Pretty dysfunctional too, if you count four separate naming schemes, the first and last could be thought of as one with interruptions, one of which used names instead of numbers, parallel versions, etc...
Granted most of that is long-ago history, and much more popular (read -- we know it anyway from sheer repetition) history.
All the current versions are easy to remember, you only need to keep track of two names.



But I am pretty sure there are plenty of people who use OSX a lot who can tell you which is which -- they've learned the order.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote