View Single Post
Old 11-03-2015, 05:03 PM   #28
GibbinR
Connoisseur
GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GibbinR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 81
Karma: 6788226
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chester, UK
Device: Kobo Aura One, iPad mini 5, Kindle Oasis 3
Reverting to the subject of Alex's original post, it seems to me that what we have is simply some indirect speech punctuated in a way that is not now done.
- The novel was written in 1846 when maybe punctuation conventions were not quite as fixed as they are now.
- The 'Note on the Text' in my own copy of 'The Professor' (Penguin Classics 1989), specifically refers to Charlotte Bronte's 'somewhat idiosyncratic punctuation'.

I have an irritating feeling that I have seen another example of this in another novel from the period, but haven't managed to remember anything concrete enough to check.
GibbinR is offline   Reply With Quote