View Single Post
Old 11-03-2015, 02:39 AM   #23
AlexBell
Wizard
AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.AlexBell ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
AlexBell's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,413
Karma: 13369310
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Launceston, Tasmania
Device: Sony PRS T3, Kobo Glo, Kindle Touch, iPad, Samsung SB 2 tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrannyGrump View Post
I don't know if there is a name for it, but I see paraphrases put in quotes like this quite frequently in 19th century books. I personally think of it as similar to our current usage of the curled fingers while speaking to indicate a humorous (if not sarcastic) "quote-quote".

Incidentally, I have worked with quite a few 19th and early 20th century books from UK publishers that do indeed use double quotation marks. I think HarryT pointed out somewhere, somewhen, that the standard British usage of Single Quotes did not really take over until after World War I.
Sarcastic would fit.

I've seen pdfs of 19th century books by the same publisher using double quotes in some books and single quotes in others. I really don't care much myself whether it's single or double.
AlexBell is offline   Reply With Quote