View Single Post
Old 10-30-2015, 05:41 PM   #6
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,475
Karma: 8025702
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgaillard View Post
Grouping by month added in CC would be perfect, provided that the more recents are at the top.
And this is the problem. Currently they are sorted "ascending" which means that the most recent are at the bottom. I am willing to change that, but it will take thought to make work.

Why am I willing to change it? During my testing I discovered that the computation of the year-month doesn't work correctly for timezones other that GMT. Given that no one has reported this problem I think that the number of users of date-type grouping is very small. That said, changing current behavior is always very dangerous.

Another possibility is to make newly-added dates sort "descending", something that would not change current behavior but that would be very strange because two dates (e.g., pubdate and cc-date-added) would sort differently.

Sometimes I think I should retire for-real and forget about all this stuff.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote