I agree with you DiapDealer, but I had in mind this
kind of "arguments", in the context of the J. Tallent's reply (June 26, 2015 at 9:54 am) :
Quote:
Don’t you think that’s circular? Sigil developers don’t work on it professionally, because – people rather spend their money on proprietary software instead. If money would be invested into Sigil, more effort would be put into it, there would be a concrete plan for sure, and more issues would get fixed. While the result would still be freely licensed.
skreutzer
June 30, 2015 at 5:07 am
|