View Single Post
Old 10-28-2015, 08:15 PM   #23
theducks
Well trained by Cats
theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.theducks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
theducks's Avatar
 
Posts: 31,156
Karma: 60406498
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Central Coast of California
Device: Kobo Libra2,Kobo Aura2v1, K4NT(Fixed: New Bat.), Galaxy Tab A
Quote:
Originally Posted by robko View Post
To (horror of horrors) bring this thread back on topic : it's a simple matter of economics. There are obviously a segment of readers that would like bigger memory in their reader. The same argument applies as why many of the bigger companies are phasing out SD card slots: dollars and cents. Even if they could get 16G more memory for $2/unit more than 4G, if they sell 100,000 units that's an extra $200,000 cost. Chances are they aren't going to sell enough extra units to make up the difference in cost. A small extra cost per unit doesn't seem like much until you look at volumes, then it becomes serious dollars.
SD card slots take board space, require user access.
This creates some issues (besides the cost) for a device that is going for Thinner, Lighter. Glitzier

Openings allow Dirt and Static (requires additional surge clamping devices, which need even more board space)
The SD socket has thickness and needs way more space than Onboard Surface mounted chips

The need to keep a feature in reserve for the next model release.
theducks is offline   Reply With Quote