View Single Post
Old 10-27-2015, 02:36 PM   #49
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rem736 View Post
since we are extending this to date formats, the most logical would be yyyy-mm-dd. this has been established as an international standard, by the way. i prefer yyyymmdd just because it is easily sortable as a plain and simple number. no need to designate it as a "date format" in excel or other spreadsheet programs. it is also logically layed out from largest unit to smallest unit. it simply doesn't make sense (numerically) to do set it as mmddyyyy or ddmmyyyy.
But... but... but... that would make sense!

And we can't be having with that.


I agree with you, in principle.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote