View Single Post
Old 10-21-2015, 12:22 PM   #13
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 80,589
Karma: 150249619
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by dordale View Post
I agree with other comments here--I like the looks of it and would really consider buying one except for the limited memory available to the user. I have no idea why they feel the need to implement this limitation. If it's to try and force people to buy their ebooks from B&N, it doesn't seem necessary to me. I think the vast majority of people who buy a nook will choose the simplest option--buying on their device from B&N. On the other hand, by limiting the storage available. they reduce the amount of potential sales--as the limited storage is a deal killer for them (me included). And GreenMonkey ahs a good point as well--making it harder to download epubs from their website alienates customers as well.
There is 2.8gig of non-partitioned storage.
JSWolf is online now   Reply With Quote