View Single Post
Old 10-17-2015, 08:57 PM   #68
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Sorry for the delay in responding, but I wanted to talk to the rest of the moderating team first to ensure that I had my facts straight.

You can take this as official MR policy when I say that we have never permitted people to upload copyrighted material for diagnostic purposes, whether password-protected or otherwise. DiapDealer, who is a long-time moderator of the Sigil forum, tells me that in that forum they always make it absolutely clear to people who may be experiencing problems with books that they must not upload any copyrighted files (unless, of course, it's the author who is uploading it). Your statement that:



is simply untrue.

To reiterate, we never have, do not, and never will allow copyrighted books to be uploaded to MR without the copyright holder's permission, and the presence or absence of a password on the upload does not alter that policy. This is the policy of the moderating team, not the opinion of me or any other individual moderator.

Uploading a short sample of material is of course, "fair use", and is permissible.

I hope this clarifies the matter to everyone's satisfaction.
I appear to have been mistaken, sorry.

I'd just like to say, I am 99% sure I have seen people do this. I may be guilty of exaggerating how often, and I certainly can't bring to mind any instance of a moderator discussing it, truth be told -- so I am probably misremembering something at least.
(Perhaps I saw moderators active in the same thread, and mentally associated the two, and don't know the difference now, months or years later?)


I still don't see why there should be a problem, though.
And even more so why here should be a problem with a book that isn't password-protected, but irreversibly turned into gibberish.


EDIT: And I see the decision has been made that gibberish is acceptable.
So I suppose it is a good thing we now have a decent alternative. (Because again, I am pretty sure I have seen the password route taken, whether it was condoned/noticed, or not.)

Last edited by eschwartz; 10-17-2015 at 09:19 PM.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote