View Single Post
Old 10-17-2015, 06:24 AM   #15
darryl
Wizard
darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.darryl ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
darryl's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,108
Karma: 60231510
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura H2O, Kindle Oasis, Huwei Ascend Mate 7
Quite frankly, Harry, I think that most if not all of the Judges are probably quite capable of dealing with any biases they may have. Before I had looked at Steve's links I had thought it was stretching things to even raise the issue, as all Judges are human beings and have their biases. But part of being a Judge is learning to deal with this, and I think the vast majority succeed for the most part. However, given this level of pecuniary interest, I think it is legitimate to raise the question, and for each Judge to consider it. It may well be that it is impossible to avoid a perception of bias in this situation. I can't conceive of the situation where all judges recuse themselves, and don't know how the law would deal with this situation.
darryl is offline   Reply With Quote