Quote:
Originally Posted by msitekkie
Thanks Chaley, I would suggest selecting a group and seeing all books rather than the group is unexpected behaviour and counter-intuitive (unlike Calibre which works as you would expect).
|
One reason CC behaves like this is that it shows the <<>> line, meaning that all the books in the library are in the category one way or the other. I am changing CC so that if that line is removed (there is an option in Settings / Grouping drawer to do that) then the "empties" won't be shown when a category is tapped. This change will be in the next beta.
Quote:
Thanks for the long press suggestion which did give me all the manuals, although this again produced non-intuitive results as selecting a different grouping now has no effect and I can no longer see the sub-groups. I eventually realised I had to clear the search before anything else would work, but this wasn't obvious.
|
A long-press does a search (as you figured out). It is intended to be used like a calibre virtual library. You long press on something to restrict CC to books matching that something, then you can use any other grouping to explore further.
Quote:
Any intention to bring User Categories to CC? At first glance anyway, it appears a much simpler method than using Custom Columns for what I believe should be a mainstream feature (sub-grouping) a lot of people would use.
|
Nope. Calibre user categories require access to calibre information that CC doesn't have.
Regarding subgroups: CC supports calibre subgroups to 2 levels. See CC FAQ
Can CC support calibre's hierarchical items such as #genre?