View Single Post
Old 10-01-2015, 04:02 PM   #21
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
I'm not so sure about that. I think it's following in the same pattern as the first Pixel, which is to say, they clearly didn't expect it to actually sell.

Whatever point Google is trying to make, that isn't it. But I have no idea what that actual point may be.
I'm not sure either.

The logic behind Surface made sense from day one: MS proving how good Windows can be with good hardware while allowing pricing room for the OEMS to raise their game and still make money.

LENOVO, ASUS, and DELL got the message and we now have much better Tablet PCs at reasonable prices.

The Chromebook Pixels I never figured out.
Unless they wanted to see if Google brand loyalty allowed them to charge that much...

The Pixel C might be a second, more reasonable, attempt to see what the market will bear. Who knows, it might sell.
Or maybe they'll pop up on Woot by January.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote